3 research outputs found
Combining qualitative and quantitative understanding for exploring cross-sectoral climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability in Europe
Climate change will affect all sectors of society and the environment at all scales, ranging from the continental to the national and local. Decision-makers and other interested citizens need to be able to access reliable science-based information to help them respond to the risks of climate change impacts and assess opportunities for adaptation. Participatory integrated assessment (IA) tools combine knowledge from diverse scientific disciplines, take account of the value and importance of stakeholder âlay insightâ and facilitate a two-way iterative process of exploration of âwhat ifâsâ to enable decision-makers to test ideas and improve their understanding of the complex issues surrounding adaptation to climate change. This paper describes the conceptual design of a participatory IA tool, the CLIMSAVE IA Platform, based on a professionally facilitated stakeholder engagement process. The CLIMSAVE (climate change integrated methodology for cross-sectoral adaptation and vulnerability in Europe) Platform is a user-friendly, interactive web-based tool that allows stakeholders to assess climate change impacts and vulnerabilities for a range of sectors, including agriculture, forests, biodiversity, coasts, water resources and urban development. The linking of models for the different sectors enables stakeholders to see how their interactions could affect European landscape change. The relationship between choice, uncertainty and constraints is a key cross-cutting theme in the conduct of past participatory IA. Integrating scenario development processes with an interactive modelling platform is shown to allow the exploration of future uncertainty as a structural feature of such complex problems, encouraging stakeholders to explore adaptation choices within real-world constraints of future resource availability and environmental and institutional capacities, rather than seeking the ârightâ answers
The impact of future socio-economic and climate changes on agricultural land use and the wider environment in East Anglia and North West England using a metamodel system
This paper describes a procedure to use a model interactively to investigate
future land use by studying a wide range of scenarios defining climate,
technological and socio-economic changes. A full model run of several hours has
been replaced by a metamodel version which takes a few seconds, and provides the
user with an immediate visual output and with the ability to examine easily
which factors have the greatest effect. The Regional Impact Simulator combines a
model of agricultural land use choices linked with models of urban growth,
flooding risk, water quality and consequences for wildlife to estimate plausible
futures of agricultural land on a timescale of 20â50 years. The model examines
the East Anglian and North West regions of the United Kingdom at a grid
resolution of 5 Ă 5 km, and for each scenario estimates the most likely cropping
and its profitability at each location, and classifies land use as arable,
intensive or extensive grassland or abandoned. From a modelling viewpoint the
metamodel approach enables iteration. It is thus possible to determine how
product prices change so that production meets demand. The results of the study
show that in East Anglia cropping remains quite stable over a wide range of
scenarios, though grassland is eliminated in scenarios with the 2050s High
climate scenario â almost certainly due to the low yield in the drier
conditions. In the North West there is a very much greater range of outcomes,
though all scenarios suggest a reduction in grassland with the greatest in the
2050s High climate scenario combined with the âRegional Stewardshipâ
(environmental) socio-economic scenario. The effects of the predicted changes in
land use on plant species showed suitability for species to vary greatly,
particularly between the socio-economic scenarios, due to detrimental effects
from increases in nitrogen fertilisation. A complete simulation with the
Regional Impact Simulator takes around 15 seconds (computer-dependent), which
users who responded felt was adequate or better than adequate. The main areas
for future improvement, such as the speed of the system, user interaction and
the accuracy and detail of the modelling, are c